Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aesthetic Experience
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I am interpreting SmokeyJoe's statement as not being an explicit "keep" claim; if I am wrong please pipe up on my talk page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aesthetic Experience (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Essay, and an incomprhisible one at that. TheLongTone (talk) 14:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:52, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - appears to be original research per the essay argument as well as my own look at the page. Potential synthesis of sources as well, but I have not fully checked for this. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 15:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete An essay without a clear thought in it. XOR'easter (talk) 18:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- I approved this old lengthy draft for moving to mainspace. A number of such pages are WP:OR. I felt charitable for this one because the references use the specific term “Aesthetic experience” or very similar. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.